Why Don’t People Stutter When They Sing?

singing, stuttering, One of the enigmas about stuttering is that most people who stutter when talking don’t stutter when singing. Actually, it is often thought that no one stutters when they sing, but I have observed a few exceptions. Of the thousands of people who I have either evaluated or treated, a handful have stuttered occasionally when singing, particularly when starting to sing. Nonetheless, stuttering is very rare when singing.

An acceptable theory of stuttering has to account for this phenomenon. Therefore, I am going to explain from the perspective of my theory why people who stutter don’t stutter when they sing and what the difference is between speaking and singing.

When singing, the subconscious intent is to produce a voice that contains a sequence of varied vocal tones. This sequence makes up the melody of the song. The melody of a song is developed in the brain. As this is done, the motor area of the brain sends signals to the muscles of the larynx so that they will vibrate with the right pitch and rhythm. If you want to see this for yourself, sing a song silently. If you become aware of what happens in your throat, you will sense that your vocal folds are prepared to vibrate, even though you want to remain silent. The brain sends these signals automatically whether you are singing silently or aloud. Singing is all about voice and melody. When the song contains lyrics, nothing changes. The speech sounds are formed automatically without any thought or effort. Singing works this way for almost all people.

For the fluent speaker, speaking and singing are created in a similar way from the same exact anatomical structures. The same signals to vibrate the same vocal folds are subconsciously sent from the brain. This creates intonation, the speech equivalent to melody. Intonation becomes speech sounds as the mouth moves automatically. This can happen because fluent speakers are not aware of the words they are saying. For people who stutter speaking and singing are done differently. When speaking, the focus of attention for people who stutter is the words. In one way or another, they are concerned with saying words and “getting them out”. Intonation takes a backseat as the brain tries to control word formation. Subconsciously, the brain is busy sending signals to lips, tongue, jaw, etc. Instead of the mouth automatically shaping the voice (intonation) into speech sounds, the voice becomes a vehicle for pushing out already formed speech sounds and words. For people who stutter the processes of speaking and singing are done very differently. For people who speak fluently, they are almost identical. During Dynamic Stuttering Therapy, clients begin to understand this difference between these 2 ways of speaking and they report a big difference in the ease of speaking when they do it in the way that it is don by normally fluent speakers.

fluent speech, stuttering treatment, stuttering therapyHave you ever wondered why you speak much more fluently when you are talking to yourself or to babies and animals? Aside from making you curious, the inconsistency in your ability to speak in different situations has probably caused a lot of frustration. There you are talking to yourself and having no problem. Then someone walks into the room and oops, the words don’t flow anymore. Talking alone or to pets is just one of the many fluency enhancing conditions that needs to be explained in any adequate theory of stuttering.

To try to understand what the difference is between speaking in the fluency enhancing situation and when talking to others, let’s look at the situations more closely.

Scene #1

Rover has just started to chew on your favorite pair of old slippers. “Rover, stop that. I love those slippers. Naughty dog. What am I going to do with you?” flows through your mind and without realizing it, your thoughts become audible speech.

Scene #2

Mother walks in the room, expressing her frustration that Rover is causing more damage. You want to defend him. You try hard to find the right words to tell her what a good dog Rover is. You have to say that “m” sound that is so hard for you to say. “M-M-Mother, HHHes only being (pause) playful.”

What is the difference? Between scene #1 and #2? In the first scene you forgot that you were talking. Actually, you were thinking aloud. The aloud part was secondary. You were not really conscious that you were talking. You were involved in the situation, not the speech. In scene #2, you were “trying” to talk, “trying” to find the right words to convince Mother, “trying” to get that awful “m” sound out. You were conscious of the act of talking.

In my theory that stuttering is a condition in which there is too much control and consciousness about speaking, these scenes make perfect sense. People who stutter are capable of developing flowing language as they think. It is only when they are thinking about the words they are saying and “trying” to consciously to make speech that they have a problem. “Trying” to talk and allowing your thoughts to flow aloud are two different neurological processes. The first is stuttering, regardless of whether it is perceived by the listener, or covert in nature. The other process is the way most people produce speech, most of the time.

Knowing this, it is possible for each person who stutters to explore what is easier, the conscious act of “trying” to talk, or talking with as little consciousness as possible about how to talk. This exploration will lead to a greater understanding of how fluent speech is naturally created.

Sharing Stories – Changing Perceptions – 14th Annual International Stuttering Awareness Day

The Fourteenth International Stuttering Awareness Day (ISAD), Online Conference, hosted by Judith Kuster, professor emeritus, Minnesota State University, Mankato, Minnesota has begun. This year’s conference, Sharing Stories – Changing Perceptions is freely available live until October 22nd. The conference is linked to the Stuttering Home Page website. Papers will remain available online after the conference concludes.

The Online Conference includes papers by people who stutter, their families, educators, students, researchers, and clinicians. It is a great chance to ask questions and discuss your thoughts and ideas about stuttering. For SLP’s it is also an opportunity to achieve CEU’s. This conference is a wonderful learning opportunity for everyone who is interested in stuttering.

Book review: “Speech is a River”

“She’s got it, by George, she’s got it!!!” That’s what I said over and over again as I read Speech is a River: My Recovery From Stuttering, by Ruth Mead. This book explains so much about the inner game of speaking from the viewpoint of a person who stuttered and who no longer stutters. With clarity, wit, humor, and a not a small measure of political incorrectness, Mead takes on many of the false beliefs that perpetuate and exacerbate stuttering.

Ruth Mead is a writer. I don’t know if she is a professional writer, but she is a personable writer who opens a window into the mind that is behind the stuttering. In Speech is a River she describes her own mind, thoughts and observations, but I don’t think there are many people who stutter who will read this book and not recognize something of their own mind, beliefs, reactions, perceptions and behaviors.

The main premise throughout the book is that people who stutter let their conscious mind try to control the natural spontaneous speech that can flow within. She talks about her own discovery that “Speech is not amenable to coercion”, and explains how she stopped trying to plan and think about how to say words or push air through the block she felt in her throat..

Mead is no stranger to speech therapy. She discusses her experiences with some of the therapy approaches that she is familiar with. She then goes on to explain her recovery through a self-help journey that changed not just her speech; it changed her state of being.

As much as I agree whole-heartedly with everything that Ruth Mead says, I have to add, from the perspective of a clinician who sees many people who stutter, there is more to the “journey” than changing one’s worldview of speaking. There are brain processes that come into play that might intensify the mind’s attempt to control speech. Nevertheless, no therapy will be beneficial when the conscious mind is trying to get out words or say them consciously. That is why this book is so important. It really is the only book that I know of that discusses in length the debilitating tendency to plan, rehearse, think about and try to say words.

As a person who is determined to understand stuttering and guide people to overcome it, I am personally grateful to Ruth Mead for sharing her experiences and making her book available as a free download http://stutterers-anonymous.com/.  This is a book that every person who stutters and their families and friends would benefit greatly from reading.

Getting to the heart of the problem – why stuttered speech happens

Now that summer (at least over here in the the northern hemisphere) is over, life is getting back to normal and I want to get back to my efforts to explore the validity of my theory about stuttering. Central to this theory is my belief that there is interaction between speech planning, beliefs, emotions, and the pre-motor and motor programs involved in speech execution. Speaking is meant to happen automatically, but when there is over control of planning words and how to say them, the result might be feelings of anxiety, as well as the wrong signals being sent to the mouth and vocal folds that need to keep vibrating if the speech is going to flow.

Now the question is can this hypothesis be validated through research? Not being a researcher myself, I was very excited to attend a lecture at the NSA Applied Research Symposium by Dr. Jennifer Kleinow of LaSalle University. Kleinow’ et al.’s research related to Smith and Kelly’s Multi-factorial Model of Stuttering, a model that I have referenced many times. The study she presented was designed to see if something in the internal monitoring system of people who stutter is different than in people who speak fluently. What Dr. Kleinow and her colleagues found is that stutterers showed heightened peaks in looking for errors, regardless of whether an error was actually committed. This supports the vicious cycle hypothesis that says stuttering results from over-monitoring the speech plan.

In addition, Kleinow explained that the part of the brain that tells you to stop and start all over might be the anterior cingulate caudate (ACC). This area is a kind of switchboard between the premotor, linguistic, cognitive, limbic system. It is active during speech production, apparently overactive in some people who stutter.

So here we have some support that stuttering is not just a linear problem of blocks, rate of speech, breathing or voice production. It is most likely a problem of system function and is effected, at least in part, by over control of speech planning. There may be other areas of control as well, but this study related to the monitoring of phonological errors before they happen. It is my hope that learning about this connection might encourage those of you who stutter to be aware that planning what you are going to say gets in the way of what you want – the ability to speak without effort.